After a council with his bishops, on November 27, 1095, Pope Urban II held a speech at a field near the French town of Clermont. He called on Europeans to stop fighting their violent fratricidal wars and instead take up arms against the Eastern heathens—Turks and other Muslims that had penetrated the heart of Europe. According to the Pope, the crimes these barbarians were committing against the Eastern European population justified a new kind of war, an armed pilgrimage. Led by Godfrey of Bouillon, these first crusaders would defeat everything in their path up to and including the liberation of Jeruzalem.
Today, all major Western European cities are like Jeruzalem. Our cities are being occupied by the soldiers that appeared from the Trojan Horse’s pregnant belly, the Meccan Camel of uncontrolled mass migration. Meanwhile, the roles have reversed between the Islamized Western Europe and the still Christian Eastern Europe. If we still want to defeat the African and Arab threat, this time we will have to call upon our Eastern European brothers for help, just as the Byzantine emperor Alexos I had once called upon the West.
Differing from Americans, Europeans with their many languages are like the family that never speaks to each other, until the time is come to divide the inheritance. More than ever, that inheritance of Christian culture and modern civilization is now at stake. The legacy our forefathers spent 2500 years fighting for threatens to fall into the hands of a barbarian occupier that seeks to erase even the memory of our existence.
Out of piety, the crusaders fought in the name of Christ against Islam, and for the freedom of European peoples. Unselfishly, they joined God’s batallions. Isn’t it time for us, Europeans, to once again gather behind such higher ideals? If we want to defend the cultural diversity that our continent boasts against Islamic homogenization, then we too shall have to begin a new kind of war, a guerrilla war whose decisive battles are going to be waged on the streets of Paris, Amsterdam, Vienna, London and Berlin.
Mass Migration as a Weapon of Mass Destruction
Our cities are no longer ours. The mass immigration that got going far outside of Europe has in some places already replaced over 30% to 50% of the native city population. In less than half a century, entire neighborhoods have been transformed into Islamic or African ghetto’s. Rotterdam and London have elected a Muslim mayor, both having ties to the fascist Muslim Brotherhood.
Indigenous white workers, such as the Cockneys that populated London’s working class neighborhoods since the Industrial Age, have almost entirely extincted. But those who worry about the visible loss of European natives is to be branded a racist. In other words: the white man doesn’t deserve his existence, and even mourning for his decline is considered a hate crime. It’s policy. According to our most progressive goodfolk, the white man must be stopped at all cost, because “the future of mankind depends on it.”
And what better weapon could globalist elites deploy than that of mass migration? After the guest worker migrations of the sixties and seventies, and after half a century of family reunification and explosive minority population growth, the European Commission stated that Europe must further import over 60 million more guest workers between now and the year 2050 (see report 2008/2331, section 13). By that time, native Germans, Swedes, Dutchmen, Belgians, French and British will be a minority in their own countries.
But if so many guest workers would really be needed to solve the problem of aging demographics, then why don’t European governments urge native women to bring more children into this world themselves? Countries like Hungary prove it can be done, whose government awards married couples a tax free donation of 30,000 EUR if they promise to have three children within ten years. Moreover, such incentive costs are nothing in comparison to the bottomless integration processes and language courses for millions of asylum seekers.
Almost all of those ‘refugees’ that today drop into Europe via land, sea and air are single men. They are the surplus sons of primitive cultures that stoned too many women to death for them to have a wife. Apart from a job, a home and a car, these men also expect to claim a European wife. Germany’s childless Chancellor Merkel, a vicar’s daughter, conveniently served a generation of German women as a nearly religious example to soon ‘ease’ their genetic displacement.
Western European governing officials consciously chose to pursue the politics of replacement. Not for nothing do they call migrants refugees rather than guest workers, because that way, they can sidetrack any and all European and national law that would have stopped economic migrants at the border. A refugee, on the other hand, may not be deported and can always claim benefits on humanitarian grounds. And, also, a permanent residency permit, for these fake refugees were never intended to return to rebuild their war-torn countries.
If we do not revolt against our planned genocide now, our civilization will make way for the Islamic poison that digests our Christian inheritance. The mass migration that ought to have brought us economic prosperity, brought us welfare-dependent camel herders instead. The newcomers mostly came from Northern African and Middle Eastern rural areas, people who, rejected by their own kind, decided to carry on their backward lifestyles in our wealthy Europe, up to and including sharia courts.
The fact that Islam poses a threat to Western progress was already understood by then twenty-five-year-old Winston Churchill, in 1899, when he vented harsh criticism of Islam in his book The River War. That criticism still holds true today, simply because Islam has not progressed one inch since Churchill’s observation:
“How dreadful are the curses which [Islam] lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.”
Historically, Muslims prefer to invest their energy in large offspring, in mass migration and wars of conquest, but they do not invest in the economic institutions necessary to found a higher form of civilization. Churchill warned his readers that when they would allow Islam, “the most retrograde force in the world”, to settle in Europe, “the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
Eastern European Inspiration
Last year, I traveled through most of Europe, snaking my way up from Athens, Greece, to Reykjavik, Iceland. In conversations with locals, I noticed that Eastern Europeans—Bulgarians, Hungarians, Romanians and other peoples more familiar with Islamic oppression—were able to think about topics of mass migration in a much clearer and less politically correct manner. They are way ahead of their Western neighbors.
Yes, it is true that many Eastern Europeans recently migrated in great numbers to Western Europe. Romania, for example, donated over 20% of its population, mostly young people, to other EU nations, in order to supplement labor shortages elsewhere. In turn, Western European nations have virtually moved the problem of their aging demographics to the East, a temporary though useless solution. Even the assimilation of Eastern Europeans has led to problems, especially when they, as with for example Polish workers in the Netherlands, send mostly single males.
But Eastern Europeans offer Western Europe a clear added value over non-Western immigrants. They are generally religious Christians who support European values, and they are prepared to defend them. Five hundred years of Ottoman oppression, as the Bulgarians have experienced, or one and a half century of cultural destruction, as the Hungarians will tell you about, have left a fresh imprint in their collective memories. Hungarian writer Imre Kertész, socialist and Nobel prize winner, knew the truth when, several years ago, he wrote:
“I should recall how the Muslims are flooding Europe to later conquer, or, in other terms, destroy it; … on suicidal liberalism and brainless democracy; democracy and suffrage for chimpanzees. This is always what it concludes to: the civilisation arrives at an overbred condition in which it is not only unable but also unwilling to protect itself; when, seemingly mindlessly, it worships its own enemies.”
A Tenth Crusade?
Indeed, Western Europeans elites have begun to worship their enemies, a sign of their intellectual submission to the dominant invader. Eastern Europeans are justly afraid of the crusade-like hordes of Arab and African invaders posing as ‘refugees’ who march past their cities, raping and pillaging along their way to Germany and other naive welfare states.
But to every action there is an equal reaction. A storm is coming in Europe, the sleeping bear is awakening. It is time for a new kind of war, a pilgrimage past every major city in Western Europe, a war that must secure a future for our own posterity. If we accept to fight Islam on our on soil now, it may perhaps take up to thirty years to achieve victory. But if we do nothing, if we put our heads in the sand, it will most certainly take five centuries of slavery before we regain our freedom.
The fight between Islam and the West is entering a new and final phase. Psychiatrist Carl Jung set the tone for what is decidedly still to come:
“But what is more than curious—indeed, piquant to a degree—is that an ancient god of storm and frenzy, the long quiescent Wotan, should awake, like an extinct volcano, to new activity, in a civilized country that had long been supposed to have outgrown the Middle Ages.”
European man will go to war again. The future of mankind depends on it.