Is the Islamization of Europe a Crime against Humanity?
In a shocking interview, German Minister of Finance Wolfgang Schäuble admitted he believed opening his country’s borders could save Germans from “degeneration through inbreeding”. He hopes to achieve this goal by mixing German genes with those of Arabs and Northern Africans. Perhaps the mass rapes that took place in Cologne and other cities last New Year’s Eve were just what Schäuble had in mind. It may forever remain a mystery how German thinking went from full Nazi to full retard in seventy years’ time, but it is certain that no one in Europe has ever voted in a democratic election in favor of mass immigration.
Despite that the European continent’s rich history has produced hundreds of different cultures of its own, it wasn’t until the sixties and seventies of the previous century that artificial multiculturalism was brought into this world, an afterbirth of unrestrained mass immigration. The millions of migrants that have come to Europe would eventually refuse to assimilate. Considering their high degree of welfare dependency, newcomers have generally failed at their economic assimilation. So, European multiculturalism was born as if the thoughtlessness of its introduction was meant to be.
More than half a century later, the tens of millions of non-Western immigrants, including their offspring, have severely put native Europeans’ tolerance to the test. It is no surprise that the multicultural society that was never designed to succeed has indeed failed, although it would take European leaders—including former British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and former French President Nicolas Sarkozy—half their careers before admitting it.
Having failed to assimilate the newcomers, we’ve now arrived at a phase called ‘acceptance’—we, Europeans, will simply have to accept that we will never be our own people again. How did we end up here? Why hasn’t the resistance against the erasure of our identities been fiercer? Whence came the idea to flood our nations with a surplus of Arab and African sons, a sociological and demographic disaster that would irrevocably change the future for all European children?
The Vicissitudes of Assimilation
Contrary to Muslims and other non-Western migrants that came to Europe, Europeans that emigrated to the United States have assimilated into the prevailing American culture. For example, about half of today’s white Americans descends from German immigrants. German Americans represent the largest minority in the US, yet as a group one can hardly tell them apart from other whites. They’ve blended into the dominant Anglo-Saxon culture that American colonists had founded. German Americans never ‘Germanized’ America but Americanized themselves, trading their mother tongue for English.
In comparison to the millions of Mexican immigrants, as well as equal numbers of illegal immigrants, that came to live in the US while refusing to learn to speak a word of English, the contrast could not have been bigger. By now, the US has absorbed a quarter of the Mexican population, over thirty million lives dependent on the US economy, because Mexico couldn’t provide for them. On top of that, two-thirds of the immigrants are illegal aliens. As a group, illegal aliens have contributed little to nothing to America because they remained Mexicans or Indians or Asians. While Anglo-Saxon Americans had anticipated the arrival of German immigrants to the United States, subjecting them to mandatory assimilation, European leaders had never expressed any intention to turn newcomers into people like us.
Colonial Bad Taste
Possibly, this laissez-faire attitude concerning mass immigration has a historical cause. The multicultural societies that Northern and Western Europeans, in particular, have founded may flow from a colonial passion for collecting things, i.e. their ruling elites’ urge to possess the world. After having conquered new lands and foreign countries during the colonial days, after having subjugated entire continents of people, after having looted and amassed the world’s natural resources, after having declared archeological treasures their private property—for example, put on display in the Louvre or the British Museum, and after even having practiced slavery and slave trade, there was only one more possibility left to satisfy this all-encompassing urge to possess—by establishing a human zoo, a multicultural society.
I’m not kidding. At the peak of colonial bad taste, indigenous families from all over the world were ‘collected’ and put on display before audiences in Europe and America. We have erased this dubious phenomenon from our cultural memory but even today we can recognize its remnants, for example in the form of Madame Tussaud’s museums. Such expositions may be an expression of Western man’s dark side, of he who wants to possess the wax bodies of his idols.
Until 1950, day trippers and their children could visit nomadic families living in human zoos. Few Sami families from Lapland, for example, allowed themselves to be put on display in the Hagenbeck Zoo near Hamburg, Germany. Likewise, Sioux Indians were ‘open to the public’ in Chicago. These families were not slaves. They received pay and sometimes negotiated good deals including hotel stays. Some were professional actors who seized the opportunity that an education in modern Europe offered them. Above all, it offered participants a rare chance to show their nomadic culture to the world at a time without television and internet. Aside from cases of unavoidable abuse, the human zoos had, at least to some extent, served to educate the people.
The Fate of the Sami
The aforementioned Sami peoples still live in Northern Norway, housing about half the total population, as well as in Sweden, Finland, and on the Russian Kola peninsula. They had lived there long before national borders crossed their habitats. The Sami descend from people who settled in the area sometime ten to six thousand years ago. As a people, they form their own ethnic group, independent from the more southern located Fins, Swedes, and Norwegians. For thousands of years, Scandinavians and Sami have shared an overlapping habitat but in a relatively peaceful manner. Each group relied on different types of food and natural resources. Early on, the southern Scandinavians had begun to trade over the sea with other Europeans. They would build farms while the Sami specialized as hunters and gatherers that lived off fishing and reindeer husbandry.
The Sami are indigenous Europeans, white people with blond hair but they differ genetically from other Europeans. Scientists suspect the Sami are descendants of a smaller genetic branch of Europeans that separated from the rest of us in a distant past. Their faces feature a narrower, flatter nose bridge, perhaps to heat the colder polar air when breathing, as well as varying degrees of “gook eyes” as some East Asian peoples display (with whom the Sami are not related).
The Sami were first mentioned in Norwegian and Icelandic sagas from the eleventh to the thirteenth century, for example in Egil’s Saga which recounts how Iceland’s national hero and his Viking buddies spent their summers sailing to Norway, traveling to Lapland looking for Sami, bashing in their skulls and looting their food and wealth. Throughout history, the Sami have commonly been depicted as inferior human beings by their European cousins. They have not been treated well.
As the industrialization of Europe reached the far north, the Sami were forced to surrender the land intended for their reindeer herds. In Sweden, they were put to work in a slave mine near Kiruna. European anthropologists would hold members of various Sami tribes at gunpoint, forcing them to undress and undergo the sort of ‘bone measurements’ inmates of Nazi Germany would later experience. Naturally, such measurements were intended to ‘prove’ Sami inferiority and the superiority of other Europeans. Even until 1975, Sami women were forced to undergo sterilization in an attempt to halt their continued population growth.
Still, in 2011, the United Nations committee against racial discrimination reprimanded the Norwegian government with a report to improve the position of the Sami. During the past millennium, the Sami’s cultural identity has come under pressure. Until recently, Sami children weren’t even allowed an education in their own language. All of the nearly dozen Sami languages are listed on a UN list for threatened and endangered languages. As with the other Europeans before them, the Christening of the Sami largely erased the memory of their earlier tribal faith.
Tolerance is a Two-Way Street
But isn’t it hypocrite that precisely these Norwegians and Swedes, who are world-renowned for their tolerance, have opened their own nations’ borders to non-Western immigrants while at the same time their treatment of the Sami should be a warning for anyone moving north? Is it possible that with the arrival of Arabs, Turks, Northern Africans, and Eastern Europeans the roles are being reversed and that the Scandinavians, like the Sami, now have to guard themselves against the loss of their identity? We will have to determine to what extent the world’s peoples have the right to defend their identity.
If people do have a right to defend their identities then perhaps Europeans may also defend theirs against, for example, the veiling of women, the erection of mosques in their lands, recurring aggression during Ramadan’s fasting month, colonial Islamic education, and, in short, against any attack on native European culture. The taboo of political correctness doesn’t help us in trying to answer such questions because answering these questions also extends protection to the rest of the world. Naturally, the United Nations’ directives that protect the Sami against Scandinavian colonialism must also be applicable to all other tribes of Europeans. They hold true for all peoples that seek protection against their cultural drowning in a sea of unassimilated migrants.
It cannot be denied that Europe and the North are the white man’s evolutionary birthplace, sacred ground similar to what the desert is to Arabs. Here, Neanderthal men roamed for over three hundred thousand years as well as Cro-Magnon who left some of the oldest cave art. From north to south and east to west, modern Europeans are a naturally diverse people. With hundreds of languages, an even greater number of dialects, dozens of countries, thousands of traditions and customs and an equal number of ethnic identities, owing to its overarching civilization based on individual freedom, the continent is perhaps the most diverse in the world.
The idea to make Europe more diverse through uncontrolled mass migration of uneducated and analphabetic Arabs and Africans holds no credibility whatsoever. Europeans have never had a shortage of diversity that could only be solved by importing millions of ever the same, homogeneous Muslims. On the contrary, it is discriminatory and racist to claim that Europeans would be suffering from a sort of cultural or genetic poverty or that they would only be able to pull themselves out of the doldrums through forceful mingling with unwanted newcomers as Wolfgang Schäuble suggested.
The multicultural societies so beloved by our ruling elites have never received the people’s mandate. The large-scale multiculturalization of Europe and the West has yet to be repeated elsewhere unless we count among the successes of open borders the Japanization of China, the Germanization of Poland during World War II or the Islamization of Northern Africa during the 7th century. No, multicultural societies contradict themselves because either its peoples blend into one unrecognizable immigrant master race or they split up in monocultural enclaves, reducing each to the living wallpaper at the end of the other’s worlds. In fact, this is what we see happening in the US and in Europe. Individuals mix, but peoples don’t.
The true multicultural experience is nowhere to be found. Does this idealized form of cohabitation perhaps exist only for the entertainment of bored Bilderberg elites, the super-rich who climb down from their ivory towers once a year to spend an afternoon dwelling among the peasants, aping at the human apes? Whatever it is, Europeans are about to pay an astronomical price to visit this human zoo: the future of our children. The formation of immigrant enclaves that multiculturalism has infected nearly all major Western cities with has led to a social and economic destabilization at an unprecedented scale.
The clash of value systems between native Europeans and non-Western immigrants continues to demand a one-sided concession from the still dominant culture, who, for now, can afford to do so. But immigrants have an incentive to exploit this naive generosity, at least for as long as native taxpayers feel obliged to cough it up, reducing their own family sizes in order to make room for immigrant boom towns. For that matter, Muslim colonists won’t need to sterilize white women because white women already volunteered not to have any in favor of the ‘career’.
A Crime against Humanity
While the hypocrite Scandinavians now treat their Muslim guests better than they’ve ever treated the native Sami from their own countries, we must conclude that all people have been reduced to mere numbers in a global accounting ledger. The Muslims in Oslo, Malmö, Stockholm, and Helsinki simply provide the capitalist industry with greater profit margins. Those who do not are dumped in welfare programs which demand natives to pick up the tab. The Sami are not economically viable for the Scandinavian states but increasingly, neither are white Scandinavians. Islam, in the view of the globalist elites, is a fast-growing market for products and services. We have sold the future of our children in exchange for short-term profits, giving the money away to migrants without asking for anything in return.
The multiculturalization of the West appears to have been a magic trick. We’ve magically replaced white audiences with foreign ones. Still, the multiculturalist ideology will not hold up much longer. Multiculturalism is a crime against humanity. As with the Nuremberg trials, its architects will not escape their fate. Europeans will not become the Sami of the world but we will, instead, defend our right to be who we are. Unless Europeans and European Americans wish to live in reserves designated for white people, perhaps the time to begin our resistance is now.